Штучний інтелект

Анотація: Challenges related to the growing usage of technologies based on generative AI are considered from the perspective of philosophical analysis. It is argued that the AI is but a program that follows algorithms, and thus it is not capable of thinking or being a subject of any activity at all. The current AI issues are argued to lead to the transformation of higher education on the principles of humanism, so that technologies could augment human beings and their activities, while allowing humans to have control over AI and to evaluate them in an appropriate way.

Ключові слова: artificial intelligence, higher education, humanism, human thinking

Посилання:

1. West, D. M. & Allen, J. R. (2018). How artificial intelligence is transforming the world. The Brookings Institution, 24 April. [Online]. Available: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/how-artificial-intelligence-is-transforming-the-world/
2. 2022 Expert Survey on Progress in AI (2022). AI Impacts, 3 August. [Online]. Available: https://aiimpacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/2022ESPAIV.pdf
3. Lanier, J. (2023). There is no A.I. The New Yorker, 20 April 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.newyorker.com/science/annals-of-artificial-intelligence/there-is-no-ai
4. World Economic Forum (2023). Future of jobs report 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs2023.pdf
5. Matthijs, N. (2024). What AI means for higher education teaching: hype vs reality. University World News, 27 January. [Online]. Available: https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20240123095419557
6. Babbage, Ch. (1846). On the economy of machinery and manufactures, 4th ed. London: John Murray.
7. Weizenbaum, J. (1976). Computer power and human reason: From judgment to calculation. New York & San Francisco: W. H. Freeman & Co.
8. Zinchenko, V., Mielkov, Y., Nych, T., Abasov, M., Trynyak, M. (2023). Human thinking in the age of generative A.I.: Values of openness and higher education for the future. 2023 International conference on electrical, computer and energy technologies (ICECET), Cape Town, South Africa, p. 1-6. DOI: 10.1109/ICECET58911.2023.10389449
9. Rutherford. A. (2023). Thinking in algorithms: How to combine computer analysis and human creativity for better problem-solving and decision-making. APB Publications.
10. Myelkov, Yu. (2004). From explanation to understanding: the paradigm shift in visioning the factuality. Science of self-organization and self-organization of science (I. Dobronravova and W. Hofkirchner, eds.). Kiev: Abris, p. 48–58.
11. Luria, A. R. (1976). The cognitive development: Its cultural and social foundations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12. Stiegler, B. (2001). La technique et le temps. Vol. 3, Le temps du cinéma. Paris: Editions Galilée.
13. Stiegler, B. (2003). Our ailing educational institutions. The Culture Machine, 5. [Online]. Available: https://web.archive.org/web/20040711060841/http://culturemachine.tees.ac.uk/Cmach/Backissues/j005/Articles/Stiegler.htm
14. Mukherjee, A. (2023). AI and Ethics: A computational perspective. Bristol, UK: IOP Publishing Ltd.
15. Osman, R. (2023). Intelligent responses needed for artificial intelligence. University World News, 12 May. [Online]. Available: https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20230512052612694
16. Bekker, M. (2023). Heroes and horror stories: Thinking about ChatGPT. Wits University Webinar, 27 March. [Online]. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vdpt6795elo
17. Fuchs, Ch. (2022). Digital humanism. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.
18. Eco, U. (1994). Traduction et lange parfait. Dixièmes assises de la traduction littéraire. Arles: Actes Sud, p. 191–207.
19. http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Special:Statistics
20. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:List_of_Wikipedias