Artificial intelligence

Scientific journal

ISSN 2710-1673

ONLINE: ISSN 2710-1681

Select your language


The Model of Quality Assessment of Automatically Adjusted Responsive Web Pages and Applications

Plechawska-Wojcik M.1
1 Lublin University of Technology

Full text (PDF)

UDC: 519.4
Publication Language: English
Stuc. intelekt. 2013; 18(3):300-306

Abstract: The paper presents a model, which can be applied to Graphical User Interface testing. The model is dedicated especially to web pages and web applications created using Responsive web design. The procedure is based on expert method and cognitive walkthrough. The paper outlines contain the description of responsive web design, used methodology, GUI evaluation process and the application description.

Keywords: responsive web design, RWD, RWD, GUI usability, user experience

References:

  1. Smashing Magazine, 2013. Internet: http://www.smashingmagazine.com/. (Visited 8/2/2013).
  2. Resmini, A. Pervasive Information Architecture: Designing Cross-Channel User Experiences / A. Resmini, L. Rosati. – Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 2011.
  3. Marcotte E. Responsive Web Design. A list apart, 2010. issue 306. Internet : http://alistapart.com/ article/ responsive-web-design. (Visited 2/2/2013).
  4. Grannell C. 15 top web design and development trends for 2012. net magazine. Internet : http://www.netmagazine.com/features/15-top-web-design-and-development-trends-2012. (Visited 2/2/2013).
  5. Shneiderman B. Designing the user interface. – Addison-Wesley Longman, 1998..
  6. Phung, Q.M. Identifying Usability Problems in relation to User Experience with System and Tests, 2007.
  7. Krug, S. Don't Make Me Think! A Common Sense Approach to Web Usability. – Que, New York, 2000.
  8. Pan J. Software Testing. – 1999. http://www.ece.cmu.edu/~koopman/des_s99/sw_testing. (Visited 10/2/2013).
  9. Nielsen, J., Molich, R., 1990. Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces, Proc. ACM CHI'90 Conf., 249-256.
  10. Laskowski M. Proposals for application interface testing methods. Informatyka Automatyka Pomiary w Gospodarce i Ochronie Środowiska 4b/2012: 21–24 (in Polish), 2012.
  11. Howden W.E. Functional program Testing and Analysis. McGraw-Hill, 1987.
  12. Jochen P. Errors in computerized office work: Difference between novice and expert users / P. Jochen et al. // ACM SIGCHI Bulletin. – 1991.
  13. Wharton C. The cognitive walkthrough method: A practitioner’s guide / Wharton, C., et al. // Usability inspection methods. – New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1994.
  14. Milosz M. Quality Improvement of ERP System GUI Using Expert Method: a Case Study / Milosz M., Plechawska-Wojcik M., Borys M., Laskowski M. // 6th International Conference on Human System Interaction, in print, 2013
  15. Dillon A. An empirical comparison of the usability for novice and expert searchers of a textual and a graphic interface to an art-resource database / A. Dillon, M. Song // Digital Information. – 1997.
  16. Koyani S. Research-Based Web Design & Usability Guidelines / S. Koyani, R.W. Bailey, J.R. Nall. – Computer Psychology, 2004.

View full text (PDF)