Artificial intelligence

Scientific journal

ISSN 2710-1673

ONLINE: ISSN 2710-1681

Select your language


Universalization of the intelligence definition problem

Shevchenko A.1, Sosnitsky A.2
1 Institute for Artificial Intelligence Problems of MES and NAS of Ukraine
2 Berdyansk State Pedagogical University
shevchenko@ipai.net.ua

Full text (PDF)

UDC: 004.93
Publication Language: English
Stuc. intelekt. 2021; 26(1):10-20

Abstract: The main problem today in the research and development of AI is the lack of a scientific definition of Intelligence, since it is impossible to do something incomprehensible. This fundamentally delegitimizes all developments in this area and science as a whole as a product of exclusively intellectual activity, and any scientific use of the term «Intelligence» in its strict sense is unreasonable. In this paper, this problem is solved by transition to a more general universal paradigm of cognition, which allowed us to deduce the desired definition and universal formalism of Intelligence in its strong sense. Unlike previous publications, the ontology and properties of Intelligence are specified here as necessary components of Intelligence, which are subject to subsequent concretization and materialization in different niches of existence. The results of the work are of both fundamental and applied general scientific importance for all technical and humanitarian applications of Intelligence.

Keywords: Intelligence, universalization, meta-definition; meta-formalization; Universal Theory, the Universe.

References:

  1. Shevchenko, A.Y. (2016) K voprosu o sozdanyy yskusstvennoho yntellekta. Shtuchnyi intelekt, 71 (1), 7-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2016. 12.002. [Online]. Wc cvfcvwd cw cvbv: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2016.12.002.
  2. S. Legg, and M. Hütter, A Collection of Definitions of Intelligence. Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Advances in Artificial General Intelligence: Concepts, Architectures and Algorithms: Proceedings of the AGI Workshop 2006, June 2007, pp. 17–24.
  3. S. Legg, and M. Hutter. Universal Intelligence: A Definition of Machine Intelligence. Minds and Machines, vol. 17, issue 4, December 2007.
  4. J. McCarthy, What is artificial intelligence?, Computer Science Department Stanford University, Stanford, 2007.
  5. J. R Searle, Minds, brains, and programs, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3 (3), 1980, pp. 417-457.
  6. M. Turing, Computing Machinery and Intelligence. Mind, 59, 1950, pp. 433-460.
  7. P. Godfrey-Smith, Theory and reality: an introduction to the philosophy of science, The University of Chicago Press, 2003.
  8. Sosnitsky, Artificial Intelligence and unresolved scientific problems, Information Theories and Applications, vol. 18, № 1, 2011, pp. 82 – 92.
  9. Sosnitsky, Harmonious Foundations of Intelligence, Communicaton of SIWN, vol. 7, 2009, pp. 66 – 72.
  10. Sosnitsky, Beginnings if the universe model and deduction of initial system of information concepts, Information Theories and Applications, 19(1), 2012, pp. 56–85.
  11. Sosnitsky, and A.I. Shevchenko, The Chaotic Universe’s Cosmogony: the Universe’s Perpetuum Mobile, Multivariance of the Universe and the “Boiling” Universe Hypothesis, Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2(3), 2018. pp. 84–92.
  12. Sosnitsky, The universal theory as a new general scientific paradigm, Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistical Applications, 2(1), 2018, pp. 11-18.
  13. Sosnitsky, The universal theory of passionarity. Web Intelligence, vol. 17, issue 1, 2019, pp. 75-84.
  14. E. Schrödinger, What is Life? The Physical Aspect of the Living Cell. Cambridge: University Press, 1944.
  15. E. Schrödinger, Is Life based on the Laws of Physics?, https://www.informationphilosopher.com/solutions/scientists/schrodinger/What-Is_Life-7.pdf.
  16. Pavlov, I. P.: Conditioned reflexes. An investigation of the physiological activity of the cerebral cortex, Oxford University Press, London (1927).
  17. Saladin, K.: Human anatomy (3rd ed.), McGraw-Hill, New York (2011).
  18. Shevchenko. The God. Nauka i Osvita, Kiev, 2017.
  19. Platon. Tymei // Dyalohy T.Z -M.: Mыsl, 1999. - S.421- 500.
  20. Hamilton E., Cairns H.: Collected Dialogues of Plato. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1962)
  21. Boakes R.: From Darwin to behaviourism. Cambridge: University Press, 1984.
  22. Newton I. The Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy,1729, https://archive.org/stream/newtonspmathema00newtrich#page/n43/mode/2up.
  23. Poincaré A. Science and Hypothesis. The Walter Scott Publishing Co., New York, 1905.
  24. Puancare A. O nauke. M.: Nauka. Hlavnaia redaktsyia fyz.-mat. lyteraturы, 1983. - 560s.
  25. Gumilev, L. N.: Les Fluctuations du niveau de la mer Caspienne. Cahiers du Monde Russe et Sovietique, Paris, 6(3), pp. 331–366 (1965).
  26. Gumilev, L. N.: New Data on the History of the Khazars. Acta Archeologica Aca-demiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 19, pp. 61–103 (1967).
  27. Gumilev L.N. Эtnohenez y byosfera Zemly /Pod red. doktora heohr. nauk. professora V. S. Zhekulyna. - 2 yzd. yspr. y dop. - L.: Yzd-vo LHU. 1989. - 496 s.
  28. Gumilev L.N. Heohrafyia эtnosa v ystorycheskyi peryod. - L.: Nauka. 1990 -253 s.
  29. Gödel K. On Formally Undecidable Propositions of the Principia Mathematica and Related Systems. In Davis, Martin (ed.) The Undecidable: Basic Papers On Undecidable Propositions, Unsolvable Problems And Computable Functions. New York, Raven Press, 1965, pp. 6-8.
  30. Khaken H. Synerhetyka. M., Myr, 1980. – 405 s.
  31. Vernadskyi V.Y. Fylosofskye mыsly naturalysta. M.: Nauka, 1988. - 519s.
  32. Kremen V. H. Pedahohichna synerhetyka: poniatiino-katehorialnyi syntez // Filosofiia osvity. Teoriia i praktyka upravlinnia sotsialnymy systemamy. - №3. -2013. – S. 3-19.
  33. Kremen V. H. Synerhetyka v osviti: kontekst liudynotsentryzmu / V. H. Kremen, V. V. Ilin. –– K. : Ped. dumka, 2012. –– 367 s.

View full text (PDF)