Artificial intelligence

Abstract: The article is devoted to solving the main tasks set in the work with the aim of analyzing and substantiating the implementation of intelligent control systems in technological processes of mechanical engineering, with an emphasis on increasing efficiency, accuracy, and reliability of production. The use of multi-agent systems and decentralized control systems, which significantly enhance the flexibility and adaptability of production, is analyzed. Special attention is paid to the role of physics-informed neural networks in fault diagnosis, which ensures increased reliability and reduced maintenance costs for equipment. The effectiveness of applying machine learning algorithms to optimize production processes, particularly in material processing and equipment maintenance, is evaluated. The impact of integrating intelligent control systems on production performance and quality, especially in the processes of milling and bonding large parts, is considered. Practical recommendations have been developed for the implementation of an adaptive intelligent production management system (AIPMS), which combines multi-agent systems, neural networks, digital twins, and innovative materials. The implementation of the artificial intelligence concept in production processes will contribute to the further development of mechanical engineering from a technological perspective, enabling enterprises to adopt innovations more rapidly, increase automation, and enhance the adaptability of technological processes, which in turn will lead to significant improvements in product quality and competitiveness. The use of such systems allows optimizing technological processes, reducing the number of defects, lowering energy consumption, and improving environmental efficiency.

Keywords: intelligent control systems, machine learning, neural networks, maintenance, digital twins, decentralized control, optimization of production processes

References:

1. Shevchenko, A. (Ed.). (2023). Strategy for artificial intelligence development in Ukraine: Monograph. Kyiv: IAIP. https://doi.org/10.15407/development_strategy_2023
2. Kondratenko, Y., Shevchenko, A., Zhukov, Y., Klymenko, M., Slyusar, V., Kondratenko, G., & Striuk, O. (2023, October 13-15). Analysis of the priorities and perspectives in artificial intelligence implementation. In 13th International IEEE Conference on Dependable Systems, Services and Technologies (DESSERT'2023). Athens, Greece. https://doi.org/10.1109/dessert61349.2023.10416432
3. Gräler, I., & Pöhler, A. (2018). Intelligent devices in a decentralized production system concept. Procedia CIRP, 67, 116–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.12.186
4. Slyusar, V. (2021, May 11-13). The concept of networked distributed engine control system of future air vehicles. In AVT-357 Research Workshop on Technologies for Future Distributed Engine Control Systems (DECS). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353351319
5. Xu, Z., Zhao, K., Wang, J., & Bashir, M. (2024). Physics-informed probabilistic deep network with interpretable mechanism for trustworthy mechanical fault diagnosis. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 62, Part C. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2024.102806
6. Schmucker, B., Trautwein, F., Hartl, R., Lechler, A., Zaeh, M. F., & Verl, A. (2022). Online parameterization of a milling force model using an intelligent system architecture and Bayesian optimization. Procedia CIRP, 107, 1041–1046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2022.05.105
7. Schmidt, J., Grandi, F., Peruzzini, M., Raffaeli, R., & Pellicciari, M. (2020). Novel robotic cell architecture for zero defect intelligent deburring. Procedia Manufacturing, 51, 140–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.021
8. OASIS. (2014, October). MQTT version 3.1.1. OASIS Standard. https://docs.oasis-open.org/mqtt/mqtt/v3.1.1/os/mqtt-v3.1.1-os.html
9. Dovgyi, S., Kopiika, O., Kozlov, O., & Lytvynenko, A. (2023). Features of message transport service in automated special-purpose systems. In Communications in Computer and Information Science (pp. 119–132). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46880-3_8
10. Dovgiy, S., Kopiika, O., & Kozlov, O. (2021). Architectures for the information systems, network resources and network services. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings (Vol. 3187, pp. 293–301). https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3187/short9.pdf
11. Lu, Z., Zhuang, Z., Huang, Z., & Qin, W. (2019). A framework of multi-agent based intelligent production logistics system. Procedia CIRP, 83, 557–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.04.116
12. Bryg, M., Bertram, T., Kipfmüller, M., & Kotschenreuther, J. (2023). Modular and reconfigurable simulation environment for evaluating the dynamic behavior of coupled robots performing milling tasks. Procedia CIRP, 118, 223–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2023.06.039
13. Feng, D., Lai, J., Wei, W., & Hao, B. (2024). A novel deviation measurement for scheduled intelligent transportation system via comparative spatial-temporal path networks. Digital Communications and Networks. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcan.2024.04.002
14. Taheri Kahnamouei, J., & Moallem, M. (2024). Advancements in control systems and integration of artificial intelligence in welding robots: A review. Ocean Engineering, 312, Part 3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.119294
15. Padovano, A., Longo, F., Nicoletti, L., Gazzaneo, L., Chiurco, A., & Talarico, S. (2021). A prescriptive maintenance system for intelligent production planning and control in a smart cyber-physical production line. Procedia CIRP, 104, 1819–1824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.11.307
16. Dittler, D., Stegmaier, V., Jazdi, N., & Weyrich, M. (2024). Illustrating the benefits of efficient creation and adaption of behavior models in intelligent digital twins over the machine life cycle. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 76, 520–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2024.08.016